Coronavirus COVID-19 wipes $50 billion off global exports in February alone

The extent of the damage to the global economy caused by novel coronavirus COVID-19 moved further into focus on Wednesday as UN economists announced a likely $50 billion drop in worldwide manufacturing exports in February alone.

Preliminary economic data analysed by the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD).

in Geneva indicate that virus containment measures in China – where the outbreak emerged in December – have already caused a “substantial decline in output”.

For developing economies that are reliant on selling raw materials, the effects could be felt “very, very intensely”, said Pamela Coke-Hamilton, who heads UNCTAD’s Division on International Trade and Commodities.

“Assuming that it is not mitigated in the short-term, it’s likely that the overall impact on the global economy is going to be significant in terms of a negative downturn,” she said.

Citing the China Manufacturing Purchasing Manager’s Index (PMI), the UN economist noted that it had fallen to 37.5 -  a drop of about 20 points – the lowest reading since 2004.

“This also correlates directly to exports and also implies a two per cent drop in overall exports,” she said, with a resulting “ripple effect” worldwide “to the tune of a $50 billion fall in exports”.

Because China has become the main supplier of finished products and so-called “intermediate” products used in countless industries, from chemical for pharmaceuticals to parts for digital cameras and the car industry, concerns about the long-term disruption to supply chains there has left many companies around the world “fearful” that their own output may soon be affected, UNCTAD said.

“Of course, if the virus continues to spread and gets out of control, and we’ll see closures not only in China but also in India and the United States and everywhere else in the world, then it would be a big problem,” said Alessandro Nicita, from UNCTAD’s Division on International Trade and Commodities.

“Ultimately, the economic impact of this virus depends on the measures that countries apply to contain the virus. So, China has done a great job in containing the virus, but it has sacrificed a little bit the economy, at least in the first few weeks. So, planned closures, restriction to movement of people, which were all necessary; but there is an economic effect when you take those measures.”

In addition to falling manufacturing levels, UNCTAD also highlighted a decrease in the number of container ships leaving Shanghai in the first half of February (from around 300 a week to 180), which then returned to normal levels in the second half of the month.

“Right now, the impact on the global value chains is already being felt and will continue probably for a few months,” Ms. Coke-Hamilton said. “But if it rebounds, say in the next few months, then the long-term or year-long impact will be a little different and will be better. So it depends on what happens in China.”

Responding to questions about whether countries might react to a potential supply-chain squeeze by looking to domestic manufacturers instead, the UNCTAD economists explained that such a measure would unlikely be effective in the short-term.

“China has built a huge logistics - transport logistics - which is like harbours, shipping lanes, airplanes, that actually are able to move all of those goods in and out of China,” Mr Nicita explained. “Now yes, some industries may be able to find some sort of alternative supplier like in Mexico or East Europe, but that will require even more time, because not only production needs to be moved, but also the infrastructure related to logistics would need to be built.”

Ms. Coke-Hamilton added: “It was the same argument that was used when the US President thought that … imposing certain measures on certain countries would shift production back to the United States. It’s never that easy, because when companies move and they relocate and they set up their industries and their logistics frameworks, it’s very hard to shift in the short term.”

Highlighting ongoing uncertainty surrounding the economic impact of the epidemic, in which there have been more than 90,000 confirmed cases in more than 70 countries (the majority in China) and over 3,000 deaths, Ms. Coke-Hamilton said that U.S. measures “in terms of visitor arrivals, cancelling various meetings” were having a “knock-on effect” in terms of demand.

“So right now, we’re not clear on where it will go – a lot will depend on what happens with COVID-19; if they are able to come up with a vaccine then hallelujah, hopefully it will end very quickly; but if not, the impact can be severe.”

Adding tongue-in-cheek that a study on the economic impact of the epidemic on smaller and less globally interconnected countries like her native Jamaica might not have raised the same level of interest from the TV cameras and journalists present, Ms Coke-Hamilton laughed that “we would not be sitting here, simply because the level of integration of production that is reliant on China and on China’s intermediate outputs is so significant to the national economy and the global value chains that it is important to measure”.

1. Wide shot: exterior, flag alley, Palais des Nations, United Nations Geneva.
2. Wide shot: medium shot, Press room III, journalists, podium speakers, UN logo.
3. Medium shot: Press room III, Pamela Coke-Hamilton, UNCTAD, Director, Division on International Trade and Commodities, speaking from podium, with Alessandro Nicita, Economist, Division on International Trade and Commodities, at her side. Journalists shown out of focus in front of shot.
4. SOUNDBITE (EN) — Pamela Coke-Hamilton, UNCTAD, Director, Division on International Trade and Commodities: “We have done an analysis based on what is called a Manufacturing Purchasing Manager’s Index (PMI), which has fallen to 37.5 -  a drop of about 20 points – the lowest reading since 2004. This also correlates directly to exports and also implies a two per cent drop in overall exports. This results in a – well, this will show - that there’s a ripple effect throughout the global economy to the tune of a $50 billion fall in exports across the world.”
5. Medium shot: Press room III, TV camera crews.
6. SOUNDBITE (EN) — Alessandro Nicita, Economist, Division on International Trade and Commodities: “Of course, if the virus continues to spread and gets out of control, and we’ll see closures not only in China but also in India and the United States and everywhere else in the world, then it would be a big problem.”
7. Close-up: journalist leafing through press release.
8. SOUNDBITE (EN) — Pamela Coke-Hamilton, UNCTAD, Director, Division on International Trade and Commodities: “Right now, the impact on the global value chains is already being felt and will continue probably for a few months. But if it rebounds, say in the next few months, then the long-term or year-long impact will be a little different and will be better. So it depends on what happens in China.”
9. Close-up: several journalists in profile looking down, one is wearing a conference listening device.
10. SOUNDBITE (EN) — Pamela Coke-Hamilton, UNCTAD, Director, Division on International Trade and Commodities: “Assuming that it is not mitigated in the short-term, it’s likely that the overall impact on the global economy is going to be significant in terms of a negative downturn. I think also for developing countries, the impact of what’s happening in China is going to be felt very, very intensely.”
11. Medium shot: journalists looking off camera.
12. SOUNDBITE (EN) — Pamela Coke-Hamilton, UNCTAD, Director, Division on International Trade and Commodities: “The issues with relation to what the US is doing now in terms of visitor arrivals, cancelling various meetings, it’s all kind of having a kind of knock-on effect as well in terms of demand. So right now, we’re not clear on where it will go – a lot will depend on what happens with COVID-19; if they are able to come up with a vaccine then hallelujah, hopefully it will end very quickly; but if not, the impact can be severe.”
13. Medium shot: journalists wearing conference listening devices looking to right of shot, one leans back.
14. SOUNDBITE (EN) — Alessandro Nicita, Economist, Division on International Trade and Commodities: “China has built a huge logistics - transport logistics - which is like harbours, shipping lanes, airplanes, that actually are able to move all of those goods in and out of China. Now yes, some industries may be able to find some sort of alternative supplier like in Mexico or East Europe, but that will require even more time, because not only production needs to be moved, but also the infrastructure related to logistics would need to be built.”
15. Close-up: journalists wearing conference listening devices, TV cameras.
16. SOUNDBITE (EN) — Pamela Coke-Hamilton, UNCTAD, Director, Division on International Trade and Commodities: “It was the same argument that was used when the US President thought that simply improving – well, sorry -  simply imposing certain measures on certain countries would shift production back to the United States. It’s never that easy, because when companies move and they relocate and they set up their industries and their logistics frameworks, it’s very hard to shift in the short term.”
17. Medium shot: TV camera operator adjusting lens and moving camera.
18. SOUNDBITE (EN) — Alessandro Nicita, Economist, Division on International Trade and Commodities: “Ultimately, the economic impact of this virus depends on the measures that countries apply to contain the virus. So, China has done a great job in containing the virus, but it has sacrificed a little bit the economy, at least in the first few weeks. So, planned closures, restriction to movement of people, which were all necessary; but there is an economic effect when you take those measures.”
19. Close-up: journalist looking down at her laptop, the top of which is visible only.
20. Medium shot: journalists and photographer, podium speakers, UN logo.
21. Close-up: hands typing on laptop keyboards.